MODULE B: EU-type examination EU-type examination
2.
EU-type examination shall be carried out as an assessment of the adequacy of the technical design of the
pyrotechnic article through examination of the technical documentation and supporting evidence referred to in point 3, plus examination of a specimen, representative of the production envisaged, of the complete product (combination of production type and design type).
3.
The
manufacturer shall lodge an application for EU-type examination with a single notified body of his choice. The application shall include:
b
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body;
c
the technical documentation. The technical documentation shall make it possible to assess the pyrotechnic article’s conformity with the applicable requirements of this Directive and shall include an adequate analysis and assessment of the risk(s). The technical documentation shall specify the applicable requirements and cover, as far as relevant for the assessment, the design, manufacture and operation of the
pyrotechnic article. The technical documentation shall contain, wherever applicable, at least the following elements:
ii
conceptual design and manufacturing drawings and schemes of components, sub-assemblies, circuits, etc.;
iii
descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of those drawings and schemes and the operation of the
pyrotechnic article;
iv
a list of the
harmonised standards applied in full or in part, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union and, where those
harmonised standards have not been applied, descriptions of the solutions adopted to meet the essential safety requirements of this Directive including a list of other relevant
technical specifications applied. In the case of partly applied
harmonised standards, the technical documentation shall specify the parts which have been applied;
v
results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc.;
d
the specimens representative of the production envisaged. The notified body may request further specimens if needed for carrying out the test programme;
e
the supporting evidence for the adequacy of the technical design solution. This supporting evidence shall mention any documents that have been used, in particular where the relevant
harmonised standards have not been applied in full. The supporting evidence shall include, where necessary, the results of tests carried out in accordance with other relevant
technical specifications by the appropriate laboratory of the
manufacturer, or by another testing laboratory on his behalf and under his responsibility.
4.
The notified body shall:
For the pyrotechnic article:
5.
The notified body shall draw up an evaluation report that records the activities undertaken in accordance with point 4 and their outcomes. Without prejudice to its obligations vis-à vis the notifying authorities, the notified body shall release the content of that report, in full or in part, only with the agreement of the
manufacturer.
6.
Where the type meets the requirements of this Directive that apply to the
pyrotechnic article concerned, the notified body shall issue an EU-type examination certificate to the
manufacturer. That certificate shall contain the name and address of the
manufacturer, the conclusions of the examination, the conditions (if any) for its validity and the necessary data for identification of the approved type. The EU-type examination certificate may have one or more annexes attached. The EU-type examination certificate and its annexes shall contain all relevant information to allow the conformity of manufactured
pyrotechnic articles with the examined type to be evaluated and to allow for in-service control. Where the type does not satisfy the applicable requirements of this Directive, the notified body shall refuse to issue an EU-type examination certificate and shall inform the applicant accordingly, giving detailed reasons for its refusal.
7.
The notified body shall keep itself apprised of any changes in the generally acknowledged state of the art which indicate that the approved type may no longer comply with the applicable requirements of this Directive, and shall determine whether such changes require further investigation. If so, the notified body shall inform the
manufacturer accordingly. The
manufacturer shall inform the notified body that holds the technical documentation relating to the EU-type examination certificate of all modifications to the approved type that may affect the conformity of the
pyrotechnic article with the essential safety requirements of this Directive or the conditions for validity of that certificate. Such modifications shall require additional approval in the form of an addition to the original EU-type examination certificate.
8.
Each notified body shall inform its notifying authorities concerning the EU-type examination certificates and/or any additions thereto which it has issued or withdrawn, and shall, periodically or upon request, make available to its notifying authorities the list of such certificates and/or any additions thereto refused, suspended or otherwise restricted. Each notified body shall inform the other notified bodies concerning the EU-type examination certificates and/or any additions thereto which it has refused, withdrawn, suspended or otherwise restricted, and, upon request, concerning such certificates and/or additions thereto which it has issued. The Commission, the Member States and the other notified bodies may, on request, obtain a copy of the EU-type examination certificates and/or additions thereto. On request, the Commission and the Member States may obtain a copy of the technical documentation and the results of the examinations carried out by the notified body. The notified body shall keep a copy of the EU-type examination certificate, its annexes and additions, as well as the technical file including the documentation submitted by the
manufacturer, until the expiry of the validity of that certificate.
9.
The
manufacturer shall keep a copy of the EU-type examination certificate, its annexes and additions together with the technical documentation at the disposal of the national authorities for 10 years after the
pyrotechnic article has been
placed on the market.
MODULE C2: Conformity to type based on internal production control plus supervised product checks at random intervals Conformity to type based on internal production control plus supervised product checks at random intervals
1
Conformity to type based on internal production control plus supervised product checks at random intervals is the part of a
conformity assessment procedure whereby the
manufacturer fulfils the obligations laid down in points 2, 3 and 4, and ensures and declares on his sole responsibility that the
pyrotechnic articles concerned are in conformity with the type described in the EU-type examination certificate and satisfy the requirements of this Directive that apply to them.
The
manufacturer shall take all measures necessary so that the manufacturing process and its monitoring ensure conformity of the manufactured
pyrotechnic articles with the type described in the EU-type examination certificate and with the requirements of this Directive that apply to them.
A notified body, chosen by the
manufacturer, shall carry out product checks or have them carried out at random intervals determined by the body, in order to verify the quality of the internal checks on the
pyrotechnic article, taking into account, inter alia, the technological complexity of the
pyrotechnic articles and the quantity of production. An adequate sample of the final products, taken on site by the notified body before the
placing on the market, shall be examined and appropriate tests as identified by the relevant parts of the
harmonised standards and/or equivalent tests set out in other relevant
technical specifications, shall be carried out to check the conformity of the
pyrotechnic article with the type described in the EU-type examination certificate and with the relevant requirements of this Directive. Where a sample does not conform to the acceptable quality level, the body shall take appropriate measures.
The acceptance sampling procedure to be applied is intended to determine whether the manufacturing process of the
pyrotechnic article performs within acceptable limits, with a view to ensuring conformity of the
pyrotechnic article.
The
manufacturer shall, under the responsibility of the notified body, affix the notified body’s identification number during the manufacturing process.
4.1.
The
manufacturer shall affix the
CE marking to each individual
pyrotechnic article that is in conformity with the type described in the EU-type examination certificate and satisfies the applicable requirements of this Directive.
4.2.
The
manufacturer shall draw up a written EU declaration of conformity for each product model and keep it at the disposal of the national authorities for 10 years after the
pyrotechnic article has been
placed on the market. The EU declaration of conformity shall identify the
pyrotechnic article for which it has been drawn up. A copy of the EU declaration of conformity shall be made available to the relevant authorities upon request.
MODULE D: Conformity to type based on quality assurance of the production process Conformity to type based on quality assurance of the production process
1
Conformity to type based on quality assurance of the production process is the part of a
conformity assessment procedure whereby the
manufacturer fulfils the obligations laid down in points 2 and 5, and ensures and declares on his sole responsibility that the
pyrotechnic articles concerned are in conformity with the type described in the EU-type examination certificate and satisfy the requirements of this Directive that apply to them.
The
manufacturer shall operate an approved quality system for production, final product inspection and testing of the
pyrotechnic articles concerned as specified in point 3 and shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 4.
3.1.
The
manufacturer shall lodge an application for assessment of his quality system with the notified body of his choice for the
pyrotechnic articles concerned. The application shall include:
b
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body;
d
the documentation concerning the quality system;
e
the technical documentation of the approved type and a copy of the EU-type examination certificate.
3.2.
The quality system shall ensure that the
pyrotechnic articles are in conformity with the type described in the EU-type examination certificate and comply with the requirements of this Directive that apply to them. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the
manufacturer shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. The quality system documentation shall permit a consistent interpretation of the quality programmes, plans, manuals and records. It shall, in particular, contain an adequate description of:
a
the quality objectives and the organisational structure, responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to product quality;
b
the corresponding manufacturing, quality control and quality assurance techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used;
c
the examinations and tests that will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, and the frequency with which they will be carried out;
d
the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports on the personnel concerned, etc.; and
e
the means of monitoring the achievement of the required product quality and the effective operation of the quality system.
3.3.
The notified body shall assess the quality system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements referred to in point 3.2. It shall presume conformity with those requirements in respect of the elements of the quality system that comply with the corresponding specifications of the relevant
harmonised standard. In addition to experience in quality management systems, the auditing team shall have at least one member with experience of evaluation in the relevant product field and product technology concerned, and knowledge of the applicable requirements of this Directive. The audit shall include an assessment visit to the
manufacturer’s premises. The auditing team shall review the technical documentation referred to in point 3.1(e) to verify the
manufacturer’s ability to identify the relevant requirements of this Directive and to carry out the necessary examinations with a view to ensuring compliance of the
pyrotechnic article with those requirements. The decision shall be notified to the
manufacturer. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the audit and the reasoned assessment decision.
3.4.
The
manufacturer shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality system as approved and to maintain it so that it remains adequate and efficient.
3.5.
The
manufacturer shall keep the notified body that has approved the quality system informed of any intended change to the quality system. The notified body shall evaluate any proposed changes and decide whether the modified quality system will continue to satisfy the requirements referred to in point 3.2 or whether a reassessment is necessary. It shall notify the
manufacturer of its decision. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.
4
Surveillance under the responsibility of the notified body.
4.1.
The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the
manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality system.
4.2.
The
manufacturer shall, for assessment purposes, allow the notified body access to the manufacture, inspection, testing and storage sites and shall provide it with all necessary information, in particular:
a
the quality system documentation;
b
the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports on the personnel concerned, etc.
4.3.
The notified body shall carry out periodic audits to make sure that the
manufacturer maintains and applies the quality system and shall provide the
manufacturer with an audit report.
4.4.
In addition, the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the
manufacturer. During such visits the notified body may, if necessary, carry out product tests, or have them carried out, in order to verify that the quality system is functioning correctly. The notified body shall provide the
manufacturer with a visit report and, if tests have been carried out, with a test report.
5.1.
The
manufacturer shall affix the
CE marking, and, under the responsibility of the notified body referred to in point 3.1, the latter’s identification number to each individual
pyrotechnic article that is in conformity with the type described in the EU-type examination certificate and satisfies the applicable requirements of this Directive.
5.2.
The
manufacturer shall draw up a written EU declaration of conformity for each product model and keep it at the disposal of the national authorities for 10 years after the
pyrotechnic article has been
placed on the market. The EU declaration of conformity shall identify the
pyrotechnic article for which it has been drawn up. A copy of the EU declaration of conformity shall be made available to the relevant authorities upon request.
a
the documentation referred to in point 3.1;
b
the information relating to the change referred to in point 3.5, as approved;
c
the decisions and reports of the notified body referred to in points 3.5, 4.3 and 4.4.
7
Each notified body shall inform its notifying authorities of quality system approvals issued or withdrawn, and shall, periodically or upon request, make available to its notifying authorities the list of quality system approvals refused, suspended or otherwise restricted.
Each notified body shall inform the other notified bodies of quality system approvals which it has refused, suspended, withdrawn or otherwise restricted, and, upon request, of quality system approvals which it has issued.
MODULE E: Conformity to type based on product quality assurance Conformity to type based on product quality assurance
1
Conformity to type based on product quality assurance is that part of a
conformity assessment procedure whereby the
manufacturer fulfils the obligations laid down in points 2 and 5, and ensures and declares on his sole responsibility that the
pyrotechnic articles concerned are in conformity with the type described in the EU-type examination certificate and satisfy the requirements of this Directive that apply to them.
The
manufacturer shall operate an approved quality system for final product inspection and testing of the
pyrotechnic articles concerned as specified in point 3 and shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 4.
3.1.
The
manufacturer shall lodge an application for assessment of his quality system with the notified body of his choice for the
pyrotechnic articles concerned. The application shall include the following information:
b
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body;
d
the documentation concerning the quality system;
e
the technical documentation of the approved type and a copy of the EU-type examination certificate.
3.2.
The quality system shall ensure compliance of the
pyrotechnic articles with the type described in the EU-type examination certificate and with the applicable requirements of this Directive. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the
manufacturer shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. The quality system documentation shall permit a consistent interpretation of the quality programmes, plans, manuals and records. It shall, in particular, contain an adequate description of:
a
the quality objectives and the organisational structure, responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to product quality;
b
the examinations and tests that will be carried out after manufacture;
c
the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports on the personnel concerned, etc.;
d
the means of monitoring the effective operation of the quality system.
3.3.
The notified body shall assess the quality system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements referred to in point 3.2. It shall presume conformity with those requirements in respect of the elements of the quality system that comply with the corresponding specifications of the relevant
harmonised standard. In addition to experience in quality management systems, the auditing team shall have at least one member with experience of evaluation in the relevant product field and product technology concerned, and knowledge of the applicable requirements of this Directive. The audit shall include an assessment visit to the
manufacturer’s premises. The auditing team shall review the technical documentation referred to in point 3.1(e), in order to verify the
manufacturer’s ability to identify the relevant requirements of this Directive and to carry out the necessary examinations with a view to ensuring compliance of the
pyrotechnic article with those requirements. The decision shall be notified to the
manufacturer. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the audit and the reasoned assessment decision.
3.4.
The
manufacturer shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality system as approved and to maintain it so that it remains adequate and efficient.
3.5.
The
manufacturer shall keep the notified body that has approved the quality system informed of any intended change to the quality system. The notified body shall evaluate any proposed changes and decide whether the modified quality system will continue to satisfy the requirements referred to in point 3.2 or whether a reassessment is necessary. It shall notify the
manufacturer of its decision. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.
4
Surveillance under the responsibility of the notified body
4.1.
The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the
manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality system.
4.2.
The
manufacturer shall, for assessment purposes, allow the notified body access to the manufacture, inspection, testing and storage sites and shall provide it with all necessary information, in particular:
a
the quality system documentation;
b
the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports on the personnel concerned, etc.
4.3.
The notified body shall carry out periodic audits to make sure that the
manufacturer maintains and applies the quality system and shall provide the
manufacturer with an audit report.
4.4.
In addition, the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the
manufacturer. During such visits the notified body may, if necessary, carry out product tests, or have them carried out, in order to verify that the quality system is functioning correctly. The notified body shall provide the
manufacturer with a visit report and, if tests have been carried out, with a test report.
5.1.
The
manufacturer shall affix the
CE marking, and, under the responsibility of the notified body referred to in point 3.1, the latter’s identification number to each individual
pyrotechnic article that is in conformity with the type described in the EU-type examination certificate and satisfies the applicable requirements of this Directive.
5.2.
The
manufacturer shall draw up a written EU declaration of conformity for each product model and keep it at the disposal of the national authorities for 10 years after the
pyrotechnic article has been
placed on the market. The EU declaration of conformity shall identify the
pyrotechnic article for which it has been drawn up. A copy of the EU declaration of conformity shall be made available to the relevant authorities upon request.
a
the documentation referred to in point 3.1;
b
the information relating to the change referred to in point 3.5, as approved;
c
the decisions and reports of the notified body referred to in points 3.5, 4.3 and 4.4.
7
Each notified body shall inform its notifying authorities of quality system approvals issued or withdrawn, and shall, periodically or upon request, make available to its notifying authorities the list of quality system approvals refused, suspended or otherwise restricted.
Each notified body shall inform the other notified bodies of quality system approvals which it has refused, suspended or withdrawn, and, upon request, of quality system approvals which it has issued.
MODULE G: Conformity based on unit verification Conformity based on unit verification
1
Conformity based on unit verification is the
conformity assessment procedure whereby the
manufacturer fulfils the obligations laid down in points 2, 3 and 5, and ensures and declares on his sole responsibility that the
pyrotechnic article concerned, which has been subject to the provisions of point 4, is in conformity with the requirements of this Directive that apply to it.
2
Technical documentation
The
manufacturer shall establish the technical documentation and make it available to the notified body referred to in point 4. The documentation shall make it possible to assess the pyrotechnic article’s conformity with the relevant requirements, and shall include an adequate analysis and assessment of the risk(s). The technical documentation shall specify the applicable requirements and cover, as far as relevant for the assessment, the design, manufacture and operation of the
pyrotechnic article. The technical documentation shall, wherever applicable, contain at least the following elements:
b
conceptual design and manufacturing drawings and schemes of components, sub-assemblies, circuits, etc.;
c
descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of those drawings and schemes and the operation of the
pyrotechnic article;
d
a list of the
harmonised standards applied in full or in part, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union , and, where those
harmonised standards have not been applied, descriptions of the solutions adopted to meet the essential safety requirements of this Directive, including a list of other relevant
technical specifications applied. In the case of partly applied
harmonised standards, the technical documentation shall specify the parts which have been applied;
e
results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc.;
The
manufacturer shall take all measures necessary so that the manufacturing process and its monitoring ensure conformity of the manufactured
pyrotechnic article with the applicable requirements of this Directive.
A notified body chosen by the
manufacturer shall carry out appropriate examinations and tests, set out in the relevant
harmonised standards and/or equivalent tests set out in other relevant
technical specifications, to check the conformity of the
pyrotechnic article with the applicable requirements of this Directive, or have them carried out. In the absence of such a
harmonised standard the notified body concerned shall decide on the appropriate tests to be carried out.
The notified body shall issue a certificate of conformity in respect of the examinations and tests carried out and shall affix its identification number to the approved
pyrotechnic article, or have it affixed under its responsibility.
5.1.
The
manufacturer shall affix the
CE marking and, under the responsibility of the notified body referred to in point 4, the latter’s identification number to each
pyrotechnic article that satisfies the applicable requirements of this Directive.
5.2.
The
manufacturer shall draw up a written EU declaration of conformity and keep it at the disposal of the national authorities for 10 years after the
pyrotechnic article has been
placed on the market. The EU declaration of conformity shall identify the
pyrotechnic article for which it has been drawn up. A copy of the EU declaration of conformity shall be made available to the relevant authorities upon request.
MODULE H: Conformity based on full quality assurance Conformity based on full quality assurance
1
Conformity based on full quality assurance is the
conformity assessment procedure whereby the
manufacturer fulfils the obligations laid down in points 2 and 5, and ensures and declares on his sole responsibility that the
pyrotechnic articles concerned satisfy the requirements of this Directive that apply to them.
The
manufacturer shall operate an approved quality system for design, manufacture and final product inspection and testing of the
pyrotechnic articles concerned as specified in point 3 and shall be subject to surveillance as specified in point 4.
3.1.
The
manufacturer shall lodge an application for assessment of his quality system with the notified body of his choice for the
pyrotechnic articles concerned. The application shall include:
b
the technical documentation for one model of each
pyrotechnic article category intended to be manufactured. The technical documentation shall, wherever applicable, contain at least the following elements:
—
conceptual design and manufacturing drawings and schemes of components, sub-assemblies, circuits, etc.;
—
descriptions and explanations necessary for the understanding of those drawings and schemes and the operation of the
pyrotechnic article;
—
a list of the
harmonised standards applied in full or in part, the references of which have been published in the Official Journal of the European Union , and, where those
harmonised standards have not been applied, descriptions of the solutions adopted to meet the essential safety requirements of this Directive, including a list of other relevant
technical specifications applied. In the event of partly applied
harmonised standards, the technical documentation shall specify the parts which have been applied;
—
results of design calculations made, examinations carried out, etc.;
c
the documentation concerning the quality system;
d
a written declaration that the same application has not been lodged with any other notified body.
3.2.
The quality system shall ensure compliance of the
pyrotechnic articles with the applicable requirements of this Directive. All the elements, requirements and provisions adopted by the
manufacturer shall be documented in a systematic and orderly manner in the form of written policies, procedures and instructions. That quality system documentation shall permit a consistent interpretation of the quality programmes, plans, manuals and records. It shall, in particular, contain an adequate description of:
a
the quality objectives and the organisational structure, responsibilities and powers of the management with regard to design and product quality;
b
the technical design specifications, including standards that will be applied and, where the relevant
harmonised standards will not be applied in full, the means that will be used to ensure that the essential safety requirements of this Directive will be met;
c
the design control and design verification techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used when designing the
pyrotechnic articles pertaining to the
pyrotechnic article category covered;
d
the corresponding manufacturing, quality control and quality assurance techniques, processes and systematic actions that will be used;
e
the examinations and tests that will be carried out before, during and after manufacture, and the frequency with which they will be carried out;
f
the quality records, such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports on the personnel concerned, etc.;
g
the means of monitoring the achievement of the required design and product quality and the effective operation of the quality system.
3.3.
The notified body shall assess the quality system to determine whether it satisfies the requirements referred to in point 3.2. It shall presume conformity with those requirements in respect of the elements of the quality system that comply with the corresponding specifications of the relevant
harmonised standard. In addition to experience in quality management systems, the auditing team shall have at least one member experienced as an assessor in the relevant product field and product technology concerned, and knowledge of the applicable requirements of this Directive. The audit shall include an assessment visit to the
manufacturer’s premises. The auditing team shall review the technical documentation referred to in point 3.1(b) to verify the
manufacturer’s ability to identify the applicable requirements of this Directive and to carry out the necessary examinations with a view to ensuring compliance of the
pyrotechnic article with those requirements. The
manufacturer shall be notified of the decision. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the audit and the reasoned assessment decision.
3.4.
The
manufacturer shall undertake to fulfil the obligations arising out of the quality system as approved and to maintain it so that it remains adequate and efficient.
3.5.
The
manufacturer shall keep the notified body that has approved the quality system informed of any intended change to the quality system. The notified body shall evaluate any proposed changes and decide whether the modified quality system will continue to satisfy the requirements referred to in point 3.2 or whether a reassessment is necessary. It shall notify the
manufacturer of its decision. The notification shall contain the conclusions of the examination and the reasoned assessment decision.
4
Surveillance under the responsibility of the notified body
4.1.
The purpose of surveillance is to make sure that the
manufacturer duly fulfils the obligations arising out of the approved quality system.
4.2.
The
manufacturer shall, for assessment purposes, allow the notified body access to the design, manufacture, inspection, testing and storage sites and shall provide it with all necessary information, in particular:
a
the quality system documentation;
b
the quality records as provided for by the design part of the quality system such as the results of analyses, calculations, tests, etc.;
c
the quality records as provided for by the manufacturing part of the quality system such as inspection reports and test data, calibration data, qualification reports on the personnel concerned, etc.
4.3.
The notified body shall carry out periodic audits to make sure that the
manufacturer maintains and applies the quality system and shall provide the
manufacturer with an audit report.
4.4.
In addition, the notified body may pay unexpected visits to the
manufacturer. During such visits, the notified body may, if necessary, carry out product tests, or have them carried out, in order to check the proper functioning of the quality system. It shall provide the
manufacturer with a visit report and, if tests have been carried out, with a test report.
5.1.
The
manufacturer shall affix the
CE marking and, under the responsibility of the notified body referred to in point 3.1, the latter’s identification number to each individual
pyrotechnic article that satisfies the applicable requirements of this Directive.
5.2.
The
manufacturer shall draw up a written EU declaration of conformity for each product model and keep it at the disposal of the national authorities for 10 years after the
pyrotechnic article has been
placed on the market. The EU declaration of conformity shall identify the
pyrotechnic article for which it has been drawn up. A copy of the EU declaration of conformity shall be made available to the relevant authorities upon request.
a
the technical documentation referred to in point 3.1;
b
the documentation concerning the quality system referred to in point 3.1;
c
the information relating to the change referred to in point 3.5, as approved;
d
the decisions and reports of the notified body referred to in points 3.5, 4.3 and 4.4.
7
Each notified body shall inform its notifying authorities of quality system approvals issued or withdrawn and shall, periodically or upon request, make available to its notifying authorities the list of quality system approvals refused, suspended or otherwise restricted.
Each notified body shall inform the other notified bodies of quality system approvals which it has refused, suspended or withdrawn, and, upon request, of quality system approvals which it has issued.